jeudi 28 février 2013
AL JAZARI (أَبُو اَلْعِزِ بْنُ إسْماعِيلِ بْنُ الرِّزاز الجزري)
Al-Djazari
Aller à : Navigation, rechercher
Abū al-'Iz Ibn Ismā'īl ibn al-Razāz al-Jazarī
(1136-1206) (arabe: أَبُو اَلْعِزِ بْنُ إسْماعِيلِ بْنُ الرِّزاز
الجزري) est un important érudit, artiste, astronome, inventeur et
ingénieur mécanique.Biographie
Nous savons très peu de choses sur lui malgré ses nombreuses innovations ou descriptions mécaniques. Tout ce que nous savons à son sujet se trouve dans son livre de la connaissance des procédés mécaniques (Kitab fi ma‘rifat al-hiyal al-handasiyya) 1206 1.Création technologique
Selon le reportage Les inventions venues d'Orient2:- les pompes hydrauliques, machine hydraulique automatique (système de pompage numéro 3).
- Les machines automatiques.
- L'un des premiers "ordinateurs" du monde, un calculateur analogique.
- Le robot (la serveuse de thé).
- La manivelle.
- L'hydrolique reliée à l'horlogerie, l'horloge de l'éléphant qui a été reproduite juste à Dubaï.
- La pompe aspirante à double effet automatique. qui est une partie du moteur à vapeur à notre ère.
Son œuvre
Il écrivit un important traité sur la mécanique et les pendules, le livre de la connaissance des procédés mécaniques (Kitab fi ma‘rifat al-hiyal al-handasiyya) en 1206, qui lui a été commandé par le roi Nasser Eddine Mahmud ibn Mohamed ibn Qarra, un des sultans des Beni Irtaka à Biar Bakr, à l'époque du calife abbasside Nasser Dinullah Abu al-Abbas Ahmad, en 1181. Cet ouvrage a été achevé après vingt-cinq ans d'étude. C'est l'un des traités les plus importants de cette époque dans le monde musulman sur le sujet. Il existe des copies de ce livre à Topkapi à Istanbul, au Musée des Beaux-Arts à Boston, et au Louvre à Paris et à la Bibliothèque d'Oxford.Source: wikipedia.com
mardi 26 février 2013
BARCELONA Vs REAL MADRID direct gratuit
Des liens pour voire le match BARCELONA Vs REAL MADRID direct gratuit
http://veetle.com/index.php/listing/index/sports
http://veetle.com/index.php/listing/index/sports
vendredi 22 février 2013
The Future of Free Energy is here now! The end of oil, coal and nuclear pollution!
![]() |
soudan 1993 kevin carter
http://northpointcharity.org/ A new Non-profit Group promoting and financing Free Energy Technologies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wHGh2... Originally posted at the link above: The future of free energy is at hand. the end of the energy barons, war mongers and central bankers will follow. So, let's all demand this technology be implemented immediately. Imagine the technology shown here interfaces with Corning's new Display Glass Technology. This is the future for all of us. Free Energy and Free Thinking, the free interchange of all vital information via a free energy system. This is what I have been working for this past decade and now it s hear in our very faces: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we1ljl... 1 Million Watt Cold Fusion Reactor Running in Italy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2tYVa... Physics in the Age of Fakery- Bibhas De http://www.bibhasde.com/ageoffakery.html Much Love to one and all!!! Free Energy and Free Thinking http://www.feandft.com/ Mirrored by Robert Otey 11-6-11 Visit the AlienScientist Discussion board for this topic: http://www.alienscientist.com/forum/s...... Below is an excerpt from: http://nanoholdings.com/about-us/ Nanoholdings is a team of scientists, investors and innovators working at the cutting-edge of nanotechnology to develop solutions to the world's growing energy problems. Working in partnership with the world's best universities we develop products and companies that will revolutionize the way we use and generate energy. Two things stand out about us -- we focus exclusively on nanotechnology-based energy solutions and we work at the very cutting-edge of nano-energy research. Our extensive network of leading scientists in the nanotechnology field are central to our work - scientists based at eminent universities around the world, who are working at the coal-face of nano-energy research to seek out alternative solutions for how we generate, transmit, store and use energy. We support and guide their research, transforming breakthroughs into viable solutions -- products to revolutionize the way we use and generate energy. |
vendredi 15 février 2013
RUSSIE. Une pluie de météorites fait au moins 400 blessés
RUSSIE. Une pluie de météorites fait au moins 400 blessésvidéo |
mercredi 13 février 2013
How the British Divided Up the Arab World
Source: http://lostislamichistory.com/how-the-british-divided-up-the-arab-world/
How the British Divided Up the Arab World
Dec. 26
Featured, Modern History, Ottoman History
15 comments
The development of the modern nation states throughout the Arab
world is a fascinating and heartbreaking process. 100 years ago, most
Arabs were part of the Ottoman Empire/Caliphate, a large multi-ethnic
state based in Istanbul. Today, a political map of the Arab world looks
like a very complex jigsaw puzzle. A complex and intricate course of
events in the 1910s brought about the end of the Ottomans and the rise
of these new nations with borders running across the Middle East, diving
Muslims from each other. While there are many different factors leading
to this, the role that the British played in this was far greater than
any other player in the region. Three separate agreements made
conflicting promises that the British had to stand by. The result was a
political mess that divided up a large part of the Muslim world.
At first, the Ottoman Empire decided to remain neutral. They were not nearly as strong as any of the other nations fighting in the war, and were wracked by internal and external threats. The Ottoman sultan/caliph was nothing more than a figurehead at this point, with the last powerful sultan, Abdulhamid II, having been overthrown in 1908 and replaced with a military government led by the “Three Pashas”. They were from the secular Westernized group, the Young Turks. Financially, the Ottomans were in a serious bind, owing huge debts to the European powers that they were not able to pay. After trying to join the Allied side and being rejected, the Ottomans sided with the Central Powers in October of 1914.
The British immediately began to conceive of plans to dissolve the Ottoman Empire and expand their Middle Eastern empire. They had already had control of Egypt since 1888 and India since 1857. The Ottoman Middle East lay right in the middle of these two important colonies, and the British were determined to exterminate it as part of the world war.
Whatever his reasons were, Sharif Hussein decided to revolt against the Ottoman government in alliance with the British. In return, the British promised to provide money and weapons to the rebels to help them fight the much more organized Ottoman army. Also, the British promised him that after the war, he would be given his own Arab kingdom that would cover the entire Arabian Peninsula, including Syria and Iraq. The letters in which the two sides negotiated and discussed revolt were known as the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, as Sharif Hussein was communicating with the British High Commissioner in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon.
In June of 1916 Sharif Hussein led his group of armed Bedouin warriors from the Hejaz in an armed campaign against the Ottomans. Within a few months, the Arab rebels managed to capture numerous cities in the Hejaz (including Jeddah and Makkah) with help from the British army and navy. The British provided support in the form of soldiers, weapons, money, advisors (including the “legendary” Lawrence of Arabia), and a flag. The British in Egypt drew up a flag for the Arabs to use in battle, which was known as the “Flag of the Arab Revolt”. This flag would later become the model for other Arab flags of countries such as Jordan, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, and Kuwait.
As World War One progressed through 1917 and 1918, the Arab rebels managed to capture many major cities from the Ottomans. As the British advanced into Palestine and Iraq, capturing cities such as Jerusalem and Baghdad, the Arabs aided them by capturing Amman and Damascus. It is important to note that the Arab Revolt did not have the backing of a large majority of the Arab population. It was a minority movement led by a few leaders who sought to increase their own powers. The vast majority of the Arab people stayed away from the conflict and did not support the rebels or the Ottoman government. Sharif Hussein’s plan to create his own Arab kingdom was succeeding so far, if it were not for other promises the British would make.
According to what would become known as the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the British and French agreed to divide up the Arab world between themselves. The British were to take control of what is now Iraq, Kuwait, and Jordan. The French were given modern Syria, Lebanon, and southern Turkey. The status of Palestine was to be determined later, with Zionist ambitions to be taken into account. The zones of control that the British and French were given allowed for some amount of Arab self-rule in some areas, albeit with European control over such Arab kingdoms. In other areas, the British and French were promised total control.
Although it was meant to be a secret agreement for a post-WWI Middle East, the agreement became known publicly in 1917 when the Russian Bolshevik government exposed it. The Sykes-Picot Agreement directly contradicted the promises the British made to Sherif Hussein and caused a considerable amount of tension between the British and Arabs. However, this would not be the last of the conflicting agreements the British would make.
Eventually the Zionists decided to pressure the British government during WWI into allowing them to settle in Palestine after the war was over. Within the British government, there were many who were sympathetic to this political movement. One of those was Arthur Balfour, the Foreign Secretary for Britain. On November 2nd, 1917, he sent a letter to Baron Rothschild, a leader in the Zionist community. The letter declared the British government’s official support for the Zionist movement’s goals to establish a Jewish state in Palestine:
In 1918 the war ended with the victory of the Allies and the complete destruction of the Ottoman Empire. Although the Ottomans existed in name until 1922 (and the caliphate existed in name until 1924), all the former Ottoman land was now under European occupation. The war was over, but the Middle East’s future was still in dispute between three different sides.
Which side won? None fully got what they wanted. In the aftermath of WWI, the League of Nations (a forerunner to the United Nations) was established. One of its jobs was to divide up the conquered Ottoman lands. It drew up “mandates” for the Arab world. Each mandate was supposed to be ruled by the British or French “until such time as they are able to stand alone.” The League was the one to draw up the borders we see on modern political maps of the Middle East. The borders were drawn without regard for the wishes of the people living there, or along ethnic, geographic, or religious boundaries – they were truly arbitrary. It is important to note that even today, political borders in the Middle East do not indicate different groups of people. The differences between Iraqis, Syrians, Jordanians, etc. were entirely created by the European colonizers as a method of dividing the Arabs against each other.
Through the mandate system, the British and the French were able to get the control they wanted over the Middle East. For Sharif Hussein, his sons were allowed to rule over these mandates under British “protection”. Prince Faisal was made king of Iraq and Syria and Prince Abdullah was made king of Jordan. In practice, however, the British and French had real authority over these areas.
For the Zionists, they were allowed by the British government to settle in Palestine, although with limitations. The British did not want to anger the Arabs already living in Palestine, so they tried to limit the number of Jews allowed to migrate to Palestine. This angered the Zionists, who looked for illegal ways to immigrate throughout the 1920s-1940s, as well as the Arabs, who saw the immigration as encroachment on land that had been theirs since Salah al-Din liberated it in 1187.
The political mess that Britain created in the aftermath of WWI remains today. The competing agreements and the subsequent countries that were created to disunite Muslims from each other led to political instability throughout the Middle East. The rise of Zionism coupled with the disunity of the Muslims in that region has led to corrupt governments and economic decline for the Middle East as a whole. The divisions that the British instituted in the Muslim world remain strong today, despite being wholly created within the past 100 years.
Source: http://lostislamichistory.com/how-the-british-divided-up-the-arab-world/
The Outbreak of World War I
In the summer of 1914, war broke out in Europe. A complex system of alliances, a militaristic arms race, colonial ambitions, and general mismanagement at the highest government levels led to this devastating war that would claim the lives of 12 million people from 1914 to 1918. On the “Allied” side stood the empires of Britain, France, and Russia. The “Central” powers consisted of Germany and Austria-Hungary.At first, the Ottoman Empire decided to remain neutral. They were not nearly as strong as any of the other nations fighting in the war, and were wracked by internal and external threats. The Ottoman sultan/caliph was nothing more than a figurehead at this point, with the last powerful sultan, Abdulhamid II, having been overthrown in 1908 and replaced with a military government led by the “Three Pashas”. They were from the secular Westernized group, the Young Turks. Financially, the Ottomans were in a serious bind, owing huge debts to the European powers that they were not able to pay. After trying to join the Allied side and being rejected, the Ottomans sided with the Central Powers in October of 1914.
The British immediately began to conceive of plans to dissolve the Ottoman Empire and expand their Middle Eastern empire. They had already had control of Egypt since 1888 and India since 1857. The Ottoman Middle East lay right in the middle of these two important colonies, and the British were determined to exterminate it as part of the world war.
The Arab Revolt
One of the British strategies was to turn the Ottoman Empire’s Arab subjects against the government. They found a ready and willing helper in the Hejaz, the western region of the Arabian Peninsula. Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the amir (governor) of Makkah entered into an agreement with the British government to revolt against the Ottomans. His reasons for allying with the foreign British against other Muslims remains uncertain. Possible reasons for his revolt were: disapproval with the Turkish nationalist objectives of the Three Pashas, a personal feud with the Ottoman government, or simply a desire for his own kingdom.Whatever his reasons were, Sharif Hussein decided to revolt against the Ottoman government in alliance with the British. In return, the British promised to provide money and weapons to the rebels to help them fight the much more organized Ottoman army. Also, the British promised him that after the war, he would be given his own Arab kingdom that would cover the entire Arabian Peninsula, including Syria and Iraq. The letters in which the two sides negotiated and discussed revolt were known as the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, as Sharif Hussein was communicating with the British High Commissioner in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon.
In June of 1916 Sharif Hussein led his group of armed Bedouin warriors from the Hejaz in an armed campaign against the Ottomans. Within a few months, the Arab rebels managed to capture numerous cities in the Hejaz (including Jeddah and Makkah) with help from the British army and navy. The British provided support in the form of soldiers, weapons, money, advisors (including the “legendary” Lawrence of Arabia), and a flag. The British in Egypt drew up a flag for the Arabs to use in battle, which was known as the “Flag of the Arab Revolt”. This flag would later become the model for other Arab flags of countries such as Jordan, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, and Kuwait.
As World War One progressed through 1917 and 1918, the Arab rebels managed to capture many major cities from the Ottomans. As the British advanced into Palestine and Iraq, capturing cities such as Jerusalem and Baghdad, the Arabs aided them by capturing Amman and Damascus. It is important to note that the Arab Revolt did not have the backing of a large majority of the Arab population. It was a minority movement led by a few leaders who sought to increase their own powers. The vast majority of the Arab people stayed away from the conflict and did not support the rebels or the Ottoman government. Sharif Hussein’s plan to create his own Arab kingdom was succeeding so far, if it were not for other promises the British would make.
The Sykes-Picot Agreement
Before the Arab Revolt could even begin and before Sharif Hussein could create his Arab kingdom, the British and French had other plans. In the winter of 1915-1916, two diplomats, Sir Mark Sykes of Britain and François Georges-Picot of France secretly met to decide the fate of the post-Ottoman Arab world.According to what would become known as the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the British and French agreed to divide up the Arab world between themselves. The British were to take control of what is now Iraq, Kuwait, and Jordan. The French were given modern Syria, Lebanon, and southern Turkey. The status of Palestine was to be determined later, with Zionist ambitions to be taken into account. The zones of control that the British and French were given allowed for some amount of Arab self-rule in some areas, albeit with European control over such Arab kingdoms. In other areas, the British and French were promised total control.
Although it was meant to be a secret agreement for a post-WWI Middle East, the agreement became known publicly in 1917 when the Russian Bolshevik government exposed it. The Sykes-Picot Agreement directly contradicted the promises the British made to Sherif Hussein and caused a considerable amount of tension between the British and Arabs. However, this would not be the last of the conflicting agreements the British would make.
The Balfour Declaration
Another group that wanted a say in the political landscape of the Middle East were the Zionists. Zionism is a political movement that calls for the establishment of a Jewish state in the Holy Land of Palestine. It began in the 1800s as a movement that sought to find a homeland away from Europe for Jews (most of which lived in Germany, Poland, and Russia).Eventually the Zionists decided to pressure the British government during WWI into allowing them to settle in Palestine after the war was over. Within the British government, there were many who were sympathetic to this political movement. One of those was Arthur Balfour, the Foreign Secretary for Britain. On November 2nd, 1917, he sent a letter to Baron Rothschild, a leader in the Zionist community. The letter declared the British government’s official support for the Zionist movement’s goals to establish a Jewish state in Palestine:
“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
Three Conflicting Agreements
By 1917, the British had made three different agreements with three different groups promising three different political futures for the Arab world. The Arabs insisted they still get their Arab kingdom that was promised to them through Sharif Hussein. The French (and British themselves) expected to divide up that same land among themselves. And the Zionists expected to be given Palestine as promised by Balfour.In 1918 the war ended with the victory of the Allies and the complete destruction of the Ottoman Empire. Although the Ottomans existed in name until 1922 (and the caliphate existed in name until 1924), all the former Ottoman land was now under European occupation. The war was over, but the Middle East’s future was still in dispute between three different sides.
Which side won? None fully got what they wanted. In the aftermath of WWI, the League of Nations (a forerunner to the United Nations) was established. One of its jobs was to divide up the conquered Ottoman lands. It drew up “mandates” for the Arab world. Each mandate was supposed to be ruled by the British or French “until such time as they are able to stand alone.” The League was the one to draw up the borders we see on modern political maps of the Middle East. The borders were drawn without regard for the wishes of the people living there, or along ethnic, geographic, or religious boundaries – they were truly arbitrary. It is important to note that even today, political borders in the Middle East do not indicate different groups of people. The differences between Iraqis, Syrians, Jordanians, etc. were entirely created by the European colonizers as a method of dividing the Arabs against each other.
Through the mandate system, the British and the French were able to get the control they wanted over the Middle East. For Sharif Hussein, his sons were allowed to rule over these mandates under British “protection”. Prince Faisal was made king of Iraq and Syria and Prince Abdullah was made king of Jordan. In practice, however, the British and French had real authority over these areas.
For the Zionists, they were allowed by the British government to settle in Palestine, although with limitations. The British did not want to anger the Arabs already living in Palestine, so they tried to limit the number of Jews allowed to migrate to Palestine. This angered the Zionists, who looked for illegal ways to immigrate throughout the 1920s-1940s, as well as the Arabs, who saw the immigration as encroachment on land that had been theirs since Salah al-Din liberated it in 1187.
The political mess that Britain created in the aftermath of WWI remains today. The competing agreements and the subsequent countries that were created to disunite Muslims from each other led to political instability throughout the Middle East. The rise of Zionism coupled with the disunity of the Muslims in that region has led to corrupt governments and economic decline for the Middle East as a whole. The divisions that the British instituted in the Muslim world remain strong today, despite being wholly created within the past 100 years.
Source: http://lostislamichistory.com/how-the-british-divided-up-the-arab-world/
Granada The Last Muslim Kingdom of Spain
Granada – The Last Muslim Kingdom of Spain
Jan. 01
Featured, Muslim Spain
15 comments
In 711, Islam made its entrance into the Iberian Peninsula.
Having been invited to end the tyrannical rule of King Roderick, Muslim
armies under the leadership of Tariq ibn Ziyad crossed the straits
between Morocco and Spain. Within seven years, most of the Iberian
Peninsula (modern Spain and Portugal) was under Muslim control. Parts of
this land would remain Muslim for over 700 years.
By the mid 900s, Islam had reached its zenith in the land known as
al-Andalus. Over 5 million Muslims lived there, making up over 80% of
the population. A strong, united Umayyad caliphate ruled the land and
was by far the most advanced and stable society in Europe. The capital,
Cordoba, attracted those seeking education from all over the Muslim
world and Europe. However, this golden age of politics and society would
not last forever. In the 1000s, the caliphate broke up and divided into
numerous small states called taifas. The Muslim taifas were disunited
and susceptible to invasion from Christian kingdoms in the north. For
the next 200 years, the taifas fell one by one to the Christian
“Reconquista”. By the 1240s, one kingdom remained in the south: Granada.
This article will analyze the fall of this final Muslim kingdom in
Iberia.
Emirate of Granada
During the Reconquista, Muslim states fell one by one to Christian
kingdoms invading from the North. The major cities of Cordoba, Seville,
and Toledo fell from the 1000s to the 1200s. The Murabitun and
Muwwahidun (Almoravid and Almohad) movements from North Africa helped
slow the Christian tide, but disunity among the Muslims eventually led
to continued loss of land.
One Muslim state – Granada – was able to escape conquest by
Christians in the 1200s. After the fall of Cordoba in 1236, the rulers
of the Emirate of Granada signed a special agreement with the Kingdom of
Castile, one of the most powerful Christian kingdoms. Granada had
agreed to become a tributary state to Castile. This meant they were
allowed to remain independent as the Emirate of Granada, but in exchange
for not being invaded by Castile, they had to pay a yearly sum (usually
in gold) to the Castilian monarchy. This created a detrimental
situation for the Muslims of Granada as they paid regularly to
strengthen their enemies.
Despite this, one of the reasons Granada was able to maintain its
independence was its geography. It lies high in the Sierra Nevada
Mountains of Southern Spain. The mountains created a natural barrier for
any invading armies. Thus, despite being militarily weaker than
Castile, the mountainous terrain provided a huge defensive advantage.
The Granada War
For over 250 years, Granada remained as a tributary state to the
stronger Kingdom of Castile. But surrounded by unfriendly Christian
nations, Granada was constantly at risk of being exterminated. In the
early 1400s, a Muslim scholar wrote of al-Andalus’ last
kingdom, ”Is Granada not enclosed between a violent sea and an enemy
terrible in arms, both of which press on its people day and night?”
The impetus for the conquest of Granada occurred in 1469, when King
Ferdinand of Aragon of Queen Isabella of Castile married. This united
the two most powerful Christian kingdoms of the Iberian Peninsula. With a
united front, now the Christians set their sights on removing the last
Muslim state from the peninsula.
In 1482, war began between the new Kingdom of Spain and the Emirate
of Granada. Despite being in a much weaker position, the Granadans
fought valiantly. One Spanish chronicler expressed his respect for the
Muslim soldiers, “the Moors [Muslims] put all their strength and all
their heart into the combat, as a courageous man is bound to do when
defending his life, his wife, and his children.” The ordinary Muslim
civilians and soldiers were fighting for their existence and the
survival of Islam in al-Andalus, and fought very bravely. The Muslim
rulers, on the other hand, were not as chivalrous or brave.
Throughout the war, the Christians remained unified and did not break
up into separate warring factions, as they had commonly in the past. In
contrast, Granada experienced huge political upheaval. Muslim leaders
and governors were commonly at odds and scheming different plans to
undermine each other. Many of them were even secretly working with the
Christian kingdoms in exchange for wealth, land, and power. Worse than
all of that, in 1483, one year into the war, the sultan’s son, Muhammad,
rebelled against his father and sparked a civil war in Granada, just as
Spanish forces began to attack from outside.
King Ferdinand planned to use the civil war to his advantage. He
supported Muhammad in his fight against his father (and later, his
uncle) in an effort to weaken Granada as a whole. Muhammad was supported
with arms and soldiers by Ferdinand in the fight against other members
of his family, and thus was able to take power over Granada. Throughout
this armed struggle, Christian armies slowly pressed further into
Granadian lands, so that by the time Muhammad took power in 1490, he
only ruled the city of Granada and nothing of the surrounding
countryside.
Granada’s Last Stand
Right after solidifying his rule over Granada, however, Muhammad was
sent a letter by King Ferdinand that demanded he immediately surrender
the city. Muhammad was very surprised by this demand as Ferdinand had
given him the impression that he would be allowed to rule over Granada
with Ferdinand’s support. Clearly, Muhammad realized too late that he
had been just a pawn used by Ferdinand to weaken Granada.
Muhammad decided to resist the Christians militarily and sought help
from other Muslim kingdoms throughout North Africa and the Middle East.
No help came besides a small Ottoman navy that raided the Spanish coast
and did not cause much damage. By the end of 1491, the city of Granada
was surrounded by Ferdinand and Isabella’s army. From the towers of his
palace, Alhambra, Muhammad could see the huge Christian armies
assembling and preparing to conquer the city. With this depressing
future in sight, Muhammad was forced to sign a treaty which gave over
control of the city in November 1491.
On January 2nd, 1492, the treaty took effect and the Spanish army
entered Granada and officially took possession of the last Muslim state
of al-Andalus. Christian soldiers occupied the legendary Alhambra palace
that morning. They hung the banners and flags of Spain’s Christian
monarchs from the walls, signifying their victory. At the top of
Alhambra’s tallest tower, they erected a giant silver cross, telling the
terrified people of Granada below that the forces of Christendom had
been victorious over the Muslims of al-Andalus. Muslims were too fearful
to venture outdoors, and the streets were deserted.
Sultan Muhammad was exiled, and on his way out of Granada, he stopped
at a mountain pass to look back at Granada and began to cry. His mother
was unimpressed with his sudden remorse and scolded him, “Do not cry
like a woman for that which you could not defend as a man.”
Although the victorious Christians promised religious freedom and generally favorable terms to the people of Granada, these promises were soon broken.
In 1502, Islam was officially outlawed in Granada and hundreds of
thousands of Muslims had to either immigrate to North Africa or hide
their beliefs. By the early 1600s, not a single Muslim was left in all
of Spain.
The story of al-Andalus’ decline from one of the Muslim world’s
leading political and social powers in the 1000s to a rump state that
was conquered in the late 1400s is one that has no match in Islamic
history. The constant infighting among Muslims, the lack of support
from other Muslim empires, and the focus on personal power instead of
Islamic unity all led to this downfall. And with the loss of Granada in
1492, that story ended.
Source: http://lostislamichistory.com/granada-the-last-muslim-kingdom-of-spain/#more-592
I wasn’t looking for a religion
I wasn’t looking for a religion ... I just fell in love with Islam
Meet four of the 5,000 Brits who become Muslims each year
Devout ... PCSO Jayne Kemp
Published:
30th
January 2013
186
EVERY year, more than 5,000 Brits convert to Islam.
More than half of those who make the switch are white – and 75 per cent are
women.
But what would make someone want to change their lifestyle so dramatically?
Police Community Support Officer Jayne Kemp left her Catholic roots behind
after “falling in love” with Islam while helping victims of so-called honour
violence.
Here EMILY FOSTER, JENNA SLOAN and EMILY FAIRBAIRN speak to Jayne and three
other women about why they decided to become Muslim.
PCSO Jayne, 28
JAYNE KEMP patrols her beat wearing a traditional hijab headscarf and even
works extra time after shifts so she can attend Friday prayers at her mosque.
Devout Jayne converted to Islam last April and even plans to change her
name to Aminah.
The single mum, who patrols Eccles, Gtr Manchester, as a Police Community
Support Officer, says: “I thought Islam was all about women being forced
to slave away in the kitchen — but I found out it was about being generous
with your time, and patient and respectful of others.
“As I looked into it, I saw similarities with Catholicism and noticed values
such as looking after your neighbours and cherishing the elderly, which is
something older people say younger people don’t do any more.
“I wasn’t looking for any religion at the time but for every question I had
answered about Islam, I had five more. I think I fell in love with it.”
Prayer ... a group of Muslim women pray wearing the traditional hijab
Devoted Jayne even missed out on celebrating Christmas with her son, nine, and
daughter, seven. She sent them off to their dad’s and cooked her own meal so
it would be halal — the meat slaughtered in the manner prescribed by Sharia
law.
And despite the drastic change, Jayne says colleagues at Greater Manchester
Police and her family have been supportive. She is now helping to design a
regulation police hijab and tunic — as one has never been needed before.
Jayne says: “I was worried about what my colleagues would think but they have
been so understanding.
“People in Eccles have been great too — most don’t even mention it. If my
children had struggled with me covering my hair I wouldn’t have done it.
“They have both asked a lot about it but I would never push Islam on them and
they will be brought up Catholic.
“I just hope by speaking out I can show it is OK for a Muslim woman to work in
the police force and change negative Islam stereotypes.
Respectful ... Jayne says she found similarities between Islam and Catholicism
“My family, in general, are supportive. If I’m happy, they’re happy. My sister
said I’m the happiest she’s ever seen me.”
Jayne was inspired to convert to Islam after chatting to other Muslims on
Twitter.
Muhammad Manzoor, who runs Muslim Twitter account Local Masjid from his home
in Whalley Range, Manchester, helped her make the transition.
He said: “I was humbled Jayne was asking me these questions.
“She has found this religion for herself and hopefully it shows Muslims can
mix in society without compromising their faith.”
Student Alana, 21
ALANA BLOCKLEY, a media student who lives in Glasgow, converted to Islam
after meeting her husband Abdul on holiday in June 2010. She says:
My family are all travellers and we live on a caravan site. I was baptised as
a Christian but church and religion were never a big part of my life.
I was 18 when I decided I wanted to go out to the Canaries. I wanted to work
as a club rep and have the experiences people say you should when you’re
young.
I arrived in Fuerteventura and after a couple of days, a hotel maintenance man
offered to take me out for a coffee. He was Abdul, a Muslim from Morocco.
Preaching to the converted ... Alana, right, and pictured wih her husband Abdul
When I got home he asked me to come back and visit him – and after three
visits we knew we wanted to be together.
I started to research Islam because I wanted to know more about his life.
I decided I wanted to convert. I was worried about telling my parents and
burst into tears. Mum thought I was pregnant and my dad thought I’d crashed
my car.
I started to wear the hijab last summer. We got married in a Muslim ceremony
earlier this month in Fuerteventura.
I miss eating Parma ham but I don’t miss alcohol.
I celebrate Eid now, but I compromised with my parents and we all had a halal
Christmas dinner.
I hope I’m going to heaven now and I like the rules of Islam.
Jobseeker Claire, 24
CLAIRE EVANS converted to Islam last July after researching it following a
break-up. Claire, from Bridgend, South Wales, says:
After my heart was broken by a Muslim man, I wanted nothing more to do with
the religion – I thought it was cruel and unkind.
But my mum started looking up more about Islam and pointed out the way this
man had behaved was contrary to the faith’s teachings.
I read up on it and discovered that Islam actually promotes tranquillity and
peace.
Heartbreak ... Claire converted to Islam after breaking up with a Muslim man
I wasn’t religious before I converted. I didn’t really believe in God. I now
cover my hair and wear a hijab, which was a big decision. My dad doesn’t
like it, though, and I don’t wear the hijab when I’m with him.
At first I got some stares and nasty comments but in the past six months I’ve
grown in confidence. Now I go to the mosque once a week and I pray every
day.
I also took a Muslim name, Safir, but I still use my old name of Claire too. I
have a new partner too, who is a Muslim, but we’re not settling down just
yet.
Islam has made me calmer and, for the first time in my life, I feel accepted.
There’s not much I miss about my old life, except the odd sausage roll – I
can’t eat pork now.
Model Ayesha, 24
AYESHA OLUMIDE, from Edinburgh, is a model who works under her original
name of Eunice. She converted to Islam in 2009 while at university. She says:
Before converting to Islam I was a Christian – but where my family is from in
West Africa, Islam and Christianity are both practised. But it wasn’t until
I started studying philosophy at university that I began to learn more about
Islam.
At first I was worried it would be too extreme but when I studied the Koran it
blew my mind. The theories about nature and science appealed and I felt
enlightened. You can’t always explain everything in a scientific way and
Islam helps me with that.
Model behaviour ... at first Ayesha found it hard to 'square being a Muslim with being a model'
I was first scouted as a model while a 15-year-old tomboy. I was into football
and athletics – but a career in fashion is all about looks. Converting to
Islam made me realise how much we value people if society thinks they’re
beautiful.
At the mosque, women cover their head and dress modestly, so no one is judging
you on what you look like. At first I found it hard to square being a Muslim
with being a model. But I spoke to a Muslim sister and she said Islam is not
an extreme religion, so if it felt too extreme to me it probably wasn’t
right.
Now I cover my hair for 99 per cent of the time but if I don’t want to when I
wake up one day, I don’t. And I don’t do any bikini or underwear shoots.
I don’t have set days at the mosque but I do go often and I pray every day. I
would like to start a family in the future but don’t think I’d marry a
non-Muslim.
mercredi 6 février 2013
Désoleé pour le retard et l'absance
Arabe
تحذير
بعد أن تم إختراق حاسوبي من طرف مجهولين، و ذلك لمدة تتراوح لأكثر من ٦ سيت أشهر، و أكيد من دون علم لي، حيث تمكن الهاكر من قرصنة جول حسابات الشخصية من بارد إلكتروني إلى مواقع لفيسبوك و خاصة البلوجر، و الأهم من ذلك هو الحياة الخاصة.
بيسمع الشخصي أنا خليفة أتقدم لكل زوارنا الأحبة و مشتركين الصديق بالاعتذار رسميا لكل هذه الأحداث ، من مداومة غير لائقة بالحياء و صور مخيلة بالحياء و كل ما واردة من كلام فاحش في كل موقعنا بولجر فيسبوك و و.
نرجو منكم تفاهم الموقف
و شكرا لسعات صدوركم لنا ، و ليوافيكم
تم تنظيف كل المواقع المسترجعة من كل ما هو مخل بالحياء
سلام عليكم
بعد أن تم إختراق حاسوبي من طرف مجهولين، و ذلك لمدة تتراوح لأكثر من ٦ سيت أشهر، و أكيد من دون علم لي، حيث تمكن الهاكر من قرصنة جول حسابات الشخصية من بارد إلكتروني إلى مواقع لفيسبوك و خاصة البلوجر، و الأهم من ذلك هو الحياة الخاصة.
بيسمع الشخصي أنا خليفة أتقدم لكل زوارنا الأحبة و مشتركين الصديق بالاعتذار رسميا لكل هذه الأحداث ، من مداومة غير لائقة بالحياء و صور مخيلة بالحياء و كل ما واردة من كلام فاحش في كل موقعنا بولجر فيسبوك و و.
نرجو منكم تفاهم الموقف
و شكرا لسعات صدوركم لنا ، و ليوافيكم
تم تنظيف كل المواقع المسترجعة من كل ما هو مخل بالحياء
سلام عليكم
Français
Après avoir été pirater par un Hacker Indien pendant plus de (6) six mois (appartir du mois de Avril 2013) sans savoir ça bien sur j'ai pu récupérer presque tout mes emails comptes et surtout vie privé, je m'excuse pour l'incident (photo a caractère po-rno-gra-phi-que sur ce blog, et sur la page facebook) toute les in-su-ltes qui étaient dites et publier contre vous, et pleins d'autres choses
moi Kaliphe je vous présente tout mes excuses pour tout cela. et je demande paedon à toute et à tout ceux qui ont reçu vue lire tout e chose hors politesse.
English
After being hacked by Indian Hacker for more than six (6) months (appartir the month of April 2013) without knowing much about it I could recover almost all my email accounts and especially private life, I apologize for incident (photo character po-rn-gra-phi-on this blog and on the facebook page) in the all-su-LTES which were spoken against you, and publish, and many other things
I Kaliphe I present all my apologies for that. and I ask paedon to any and all who have received sight read any e something out of politeness.
I Kaliphe I present all my apologies for that. and I ask paedon to any and all who have received sight read any e something out of politeness.
Inscription à :
Articles
(
Atom
)



